CSRD Reporting: Visualizing Long-Term Corporate Sustainability Targets (with examples from practice)

In this blog, we’ll explore the best ways to visualize long-term sustainability goals in CSRD reporting. We’ll use real-world examples with different types of charts to break down what works, what doesn’t, and how to make future targets both clear and compelling. This guide helps you turn your long-term commitments into clear actions with a lot of useful tips. Whether you’re working on an ESG report, a sustainability strategy, or an investor update, keep reading.

Why is sustainability reporting important?

Sustainability reporting has come a long way—it’s no longer a corporate buzzword or a box to check. Businesses are accountable for their impact, and transparency is becoming the norm. But when discussing sustainability, we don’t mean just environmental issues. True corporate sustainability also means demonstrating social responsibility and adhering to sound governance practices. This ensures that companies act ethically, treat employees with fairness, and contribute to the creation of a more sustainable economy.

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is Europe’s effort to standardize ESG reporting. It aims to ensure this reporting is clear and has legal binding. The days of companies choosing what to disclose are over. CSRD now requires strict reporting on environmental impact, social responsibility, and governance practices. 

Sustainability reporting isn’t only about looking back at past performance. Companies also need to set long-term targets and show how they plan to reach them. Whether it’s reaching net-zero emissions by 2040, improving workforce diversity, or enhancing ethical governance, you need real data and clear tracking of progress. 

To understand CSRD regulations better, check out the neutral resources from EFRAG and GRI. 

Charts to use for visualizing long-term targets in CSRD Reporting

So, let’s talk about how to make long-term sustainability targets more than numbers on a page. Listing these goals in a table may meet compliance needs. But we are sure that sustainability reporting goes beyond ticking boxes. It’s about making commitments clear, actionable, and transparent. Investors, employees, and customers need to see not only where a company aims to be, but also how it plans to get there. That’s where data visualization plays a crucial role.

The right charts can show progress, point out gaps, and reveal if a company is on track to meet its long-term goals. Not all visualizations work the same way. Some help us compare past performance with future goals, but others can confuse or mislead us.

In this blog, we’ll explore effective ways to show long-term sustainability goals. We’ll highlight real-world examples, best practices, and common mistakes. A good chart should display current performance and the way to the goal. This helps track progress and spot gaps.

We'll look at different chart types. We'll check their strengths and weaknesses, and see when to use them for the best impact.

Bar Chart with Extra Bars

Let’s explore the first method: bar charts with extra bars. Bar charts are popular tools for tracking future goals. They show if an organization meets its sustainability targets.

Using extra bars for targets makes it easy to compare actual performance with goals. This method adds bars next to the existing data. Often bars are in a different colour or style, to highlight the target values.

Annual Report 2023 Orsted

✅ Pro: Simple and Clean

Adding extra bars to a bar chart for future goals is simple. It keeps the chart clean by using only bars, without extra elements like lines or markers. This makes it easy to interpret but also has limitations. Since actual performance and targets look the same, it can be unclear which values are real data and which are goals.

To make it easier to tell the difference between actual data and targets, we recommend using color contrast or outlines. This way, the target stands out more.

❎ Con: Misleading Timelines (and how to fix it)

In bar charts with extra bars, large time gaps between the last actual data point and a future target can create a misleading timeline. Without a clear separation, the bars might suggest a continuous trend rather than a long-term goal.

If gaps are needed, use a gap marker or note, like in the Orsted example. This shows that the target is a future milestone, not part of the yearly progress. Orsted’s report is a great example of how to visualize long-term sustainability goals in a way that aligns well with CSRD reporting principles. We highly recommend taking a look at it yourself.

Apple also used a bar chart with extra bars in their Environmental Progress Report with an added layer of clarity. Apple didn't jump from the last data point to the target. They added projected values for the years between. This made for a smooth transition. This approach helps stakeholders see the goal and the expected path to reach it. It makes the timeline feel more natural and less abrupt. And, of course, Apple being Apple—it's designed to look sleek.

Environmental Progress Report 2023 Apple

⭐ Tip: Prevent Misleading Timelines with Clear Separation

A common problem with bar charts showing future goals is that targets are far from the baseline year. This creates a visual gap, making direct comparisons harder. This can make it harder to see how past performance relates to long-term commitments.

To make things clearer, connectors and annotations can help. For example, in the Orsted and Apple cases, they show how changes will happen. This way, you can see whether improvements are planned gradually or in later stages.

Also, adding a reference line from the baseline year across the chart helps keep context. This makes it easier to compare the starting point, interim years, and the target, just like Apple did.

➡️ Conclusion: Extra Bars Work Best with Clear Differentiation

Bar charts with extra bars provide a simple way to track long-term sustainability goals. They make it easy to compare actual performance to targets. To ensure clarity, it's important to have clear visual differences. You can use color contrast, outlines, or annotations to avoid confusion.

When dealing with large time gaps, adding markers or projected values can help maintain a realistic timeline. Lollipop charts are a great choice for reports with many categories. They help cut down on clutter and keep things clear.

Bar Chart with Target Line

While extra bars are useful for showing specific future targets, sometimes a simpler approach is enough. A bar chart with a target line uses a single horizontal reference line across all bars to indicate a long-term sustainability goal. This helps you check if your performance is meeting the target. It offers a clear benchmark and keeps things simple.

Impact Summary 2024 DLA Piper International

✅ Pro: A Clear and Quick Comparison

The target line overlaps the bars. This makes the visualization more compact, allowing quick comparisons in a limited space. The unique visual style (line vs. bar) makes targets easy to spot. This helps avoid confusion, unlike extra bars that might mix in with the actual data

❎ Con: Limitations for Visualizing Incremental Progress

Target lines show stable benchmarks and fixed endpoints. However, they miss the incremental steps and milestones needed for future goals. This makes it difficult for readers to understand how progress should evolve over time.

⭐ Tip: Enhance Clarity with Styling and Direct Labeling

To keep the target line clear and easily interpretable, it should be styled distinctly—such as bold or dashed—so it clearly contrasts with the bars. Without clear styling, the line may blend into the bars. This weakens its role as a visual reference.

Directly labeling the target line boosts readability. This way, stakeholders can quickly check how current progress stacks up against benchmarks. The DLA Piper International example shows this well. The dashed, labeled target line makes it easy to track long-term sustainability commitments.

➡️ Conclusion: Ideal for Stable Benchmarks, Less So for Incremental Goals

Bar charts with overlapping target lines show steady benchmarks well. They work for things like emissions caps or industry standards. When designed thoughtfully, they allow for clear comparisons without cluttering the visuals.

For sustainability targets with deadlines, like net zero by 2040 or a 50% emissions cut by 2030, other methods are better. For instance, using bars for each year leading to the target can show clear progress step by step.

Overlapping Bar Chart

An overlapping bar chart is a clear way to compare actual performance with a set sustainability target in CSRD reporting. Overlapping bars show actual values on top of target bars. This makes it easy to see progress and check if the goal is met.

Example by Datylon

✅ Pro: Clear Comparison Between Actual Performance and Targets

One advantage of an overlapping bar chart is its strong visual emphasis on the gap between performance and the goal. This method shows the target within the bar itself. This way, it’s simple to compare actual performance with the target.

To maintain clarity, it’s crucial to use clear colour contrast between actual and target bars. The target bar should stand out without being too bold. This way, you can still read the performance gaps clearly. A lighter shade for targets and a bold, dark color for actual values is often the best approach.

✅ Pro: Space-Efficient for Single Long-Term Goals

Overlapping bar charts are compact since both actual values and targets share the same space. This makes them perfect for dense sustainability reports or dashboards. They can show a lot of KPIs without overwhelming the reader.

However, overlapping bars work best for tracking a single long-term goal at a time. If a company has milestone targets for 2025, 2030, and 2050, showing them all in one overlapping bar chart can be tough. In these cases, other charts may provide a clearer way to track progress across multiple future goals.

❎ Con: Doesn’t Provide Insight Into Contributing Factors

Overlapping bar charts display whether a company meets its targets. But, they don’t explain why performance changes. The bars show total values but not individual contributions. If readers want to grasp what drives progress, they may need extra visuals like stacked bar charts or waterfall charts. These types of bar charts break down contributions from different initiatives.

➡️ Conclusion: A Simple but Focused Visualization

Overlapping bar charts are a clear way to track performance against a sustainability target. By placing actual values on target bars, they enable quick assessments of progress. They work well for comparing single targets over time. However, they are less effective for tracking multiple targets or for detailed breakdowns of factors. With careful design and good colour contrast, they are a valuable tool in CSRD reporting.

Bullet Chart

A bullet chart takes the bar chart up a notch. It combines real performance, a target marker, and quality ranges into one clear visual. It offers more context than a bar chart with a target line. 

It tracks progress toward goals or benchmarks and it shows how performance stacks up against specific qualitative ranges. All this is done clearly and in a structured way which makes it useful for sustainability reporting.

Example by Datylon

✅ Pro: Provides Context Beyond a Target

Bullet charts can show performance levels using categories like lagging, moderate, strong, or on track. These ranges show more context than a single performance number or target line. This is especially important in CSRD reporting, where transparency is vital to show sustainability progress, and not just end results.

Additionally, bullet charts can also be adapted to show multiple milestone targets within the background ranges. For example, set ranges for the years 2025, 2030, and 2050. This method shows how actual performance compares to long-term goals.
Example by Datylon

⭐ Tip: Using Bullet Charts to Show Progress Over Time

Bullet charts usually show one data point, but they can track progress over several years. This is done by displaying multiple bullet charts next to each other.

For instance, in the Datylon bullet chart example above, each year (2020–2024) appears as a separate chart. This makes it easy to compare yearly progress toward a 2030 target. This way, readers can see both individual performance and wider trends.

If more trend analysis is required, bullet charts can be paired with line charts.

❎ Con: Clarity Issues

Bullet charts pack a lot of information into a small space. This makes them efficient, but they can also become complex if not designed carefully. Moreover, bullet charts are less commonly used than traditional bar charts. This can make it harder to interpret the data for the readers. This can become a problem in sustainability reporting, where clarity is crucial.

To improve readability, bullet charts should have clear labels for actual values, targets, and performance ranges. This avoids needing a separate legend. Moreover, performance ranges could be shaded, using tints of the same colour to provide context. Lastly, when bullet charts appear in reports or dashboards, an explanation can help audiences to read them.

➡️ Conclusion: A Versatile Tool for Clear Performance Tracking

Bullet charts help track sustainability performance clearly. They offer more context than a simple bar chart with a target line. By adding qualitative performance ranges, they show if a goal is met and how close an organisation is to achieving it. This feature makes them especially useful in CSRD reporting, where transparency and comparability is crucial.

Stacked Bar Chart

A stacked bar chart builds on a bar chart with a target line by showing how different factors contribute to a total goal. This is great for CSRD reporting, where companies need to track their progress and key sustainability metrics. These metrics can include waste management, energy mix, or workforce diversity.

Microsoft 2024 Environmental Sustainability Report

✅ Pro: Visualizing Both Total Progress and Contributing Factors

A stacked bar chart differs from a standard bar chart with a target line. It shows how different subcategories help achieve an overall sustainability goal. Rather than indicating if a company met separate targets, it reveals what each factor contributes to the total.

For example, in Microsoft's waste management report, the stacked bar chart displays how waste is reused, recycled, composted, incinerated, or landfilled over time. It tracks progress toward a diversion target. It helps readers to see which categories drive improvements and where action is needed.

⭐ Tip: Use Vertical Bars for Tracking Changes Over Time

Stacked bar charts work well in time series to show how categories change over time. By placing bars side by side for each year, companies can see trends like rising renewable energy use or falling landfill waste.

For year-over-year comparisons, stacked column charts (vertical bars) are better than horizontal ones. Vertical bars create a stronger visual flow, making it easier to see changes over time.

⭐ Tip: Use Stacked Bars for Composition, Lines for Trends

Stacked bar charts do a great job showing the makeup of a total value. However, they aren't the best choice for tracking trends in individual categories. If the goal is to analyze how specific metrics, such as recycling rates, evolve over time, a line chart may provide a clearer representation.

❎ Cons: Readability and Clutter Issues (and how to fix it)

One challenge with stacked bar charts is that they can look cluttered when too many categories are added. Without clear labels and different colours, viewers may struggle to understand the data. To keep the chart clear, limit the number of categories to the most important ones. Use no more than 5 individual categories.

Also, use direct labeling on or near each segment instead of a legend when you can. Put the most important category at the baseline for easier comparison. In a 100% stacked bar chart, both the start and end of the stack act as baselines. This allows to place key categories at the edges for better visibility.

Finally, style the target line with a dashed or bold format to make it stand out. Avoid colours that blend with the stacked segments to keep visibility clear.

➡️ Conclusion: A Clear Breakdown of Sustainability Progress

Stacked bar charts with a target line provide a clear way to track sustainability goals in CSRD reporting. They break down total progress into key factors. It allows to show what drives change while ensuring transparency.

When designed with clear labels, few categories, and a distinct target line, they are easy to read. To track trends in individual categories, you can combine them with a line chart for a more complete view.

Dot Plot

A dot plot is an efficient way to track progress toward sustainability goals over multiple years while keeping the focus on a fixed target. Dot plots show individual data points on one axis. This makes it easy to compare performance over time while saving space. This makes them very useful in CSRD reporting. Topics such as emissions reduction, energy efficiency, or workforce diversity goals can be shown in one visual.

Target 2024 Sustainability and Governance Report

✅ Pro: Space-Efficient Without Losing Detail

Dot plots are compact and great for tracking long-term goals like 2025, 2030, and 2050 on one axis. Their simple design lets you show multiple categories side by side. This is perfect for dense sustainability reports that need to communicate many KPIs.

Since they don’t use filled bars, dot plots have a low data-ink ratio. This means they display only essential information without clutter.

Unlike bar charts, dot plots do not require the axis to start at zero. Instead, the axis can start at a meaningful baseline value, which makes the differences between data points more apparent. This approach is particularly useful in sustainability reporting, where progress is often measured relative to a specific starting point, such as a company’s emissions in a baseline year. By focusing on the relevant range, dot plots help highlight small but meaningful shifts in performance that might otherwise be difficult to distinguish.

However, if too many data points are plotted too closely together, the visualization can become difficult to read. To prevent this, making the dots slightly transparent can help overlapping data points remain visible, improving readability.

✅ Pro: Clear Separation Between Actual Performance and Targets

Dot plots show the gap between an organization's current performance and its long-term target. Each year’s progress is marked by a dot, while the goal stays fixed on the timeline. This makes it easy to see if progress is steady, plateauing, or fluctuating over time. Keeping actual values and targets separate, dot plots offer a simple way to track long-term commitments.

A background connector, like in the Target example, can highlight key comparisons. The difference between the baseline and the latest year shows overall progress. A connector between the current year and the target year emphasises what still needs to be achieved. Clear gaps between dots help stakeholders understand the link between actual performance and long-term sustainability goals.

❎ Con: Hard to Capture Progress Without a Continuous Trend Line

Dot plots are great for showing specific data points, but they don’t easily display trends over time. Unlike line charts, which connect data points, dot plots show separate values. This can make it tough to see if improvements are steady or if performance varies.

A dot plot does not show if values increased, decreased, or remained stable between the dots. Therefore, we recommend labeling each year's value clearly. This helps stakeholders see progress without confusion. 

Dot plots work well for categories with consistent growth. For example, renewable energy adoption or workforce diversity. For metrics that fluctuate, such as annual CO₂ emissions, line charts may better show trends.

➡️ Conclusion: A Precise Yet Selective Visualization

Dot plots are a clear and compact way to track long-term sustainability goals. Therefore, they are great for reports with many KPIs. Starting the axis at a relevant baseline emphasizes meaningful differences. Adding connectors, labels, and transparency further enhances clarity. These updates help dot plots clearly display progress on sustainability goals in CSRD reporting.

Progress Bar

A progress bar is a simple way to show how much of a sustainability target has been met. It centers on one goal, making it perfect for tracking commitments.

Sustainable Development Report 2023 Schneider Electric

✅ Pro: Simple, Clear, and Space-Efficient

Progress bars are quick to read. They fill up proportionally so stakeholders can see if a company is on track, ahead, or behind. Their compact design allows for easy comparison of multiple targets, as shown in Schneider Electric’s sustainability impact report.

⭐ Tip: Choosing the Right Scale for Interpretation

The range of a progress bar can affect how we see progress. Some progress bars start at 0% and go to 100%. This gives a consistent scale across different targets and makes comparisons easier. However, if goals cover specific ranges, a custom scale from baseline to target can reveal real progress more effectively.

Both methods have their benefits. A 0–100% scale allows for standard comparisons. Especially when showing multiple targets together. On the other hand, a custom range from baseline to target highlights actual progress made toward a goal. But if used inconsistently, it can make comparisons less clear. If a custom range is chosen, clear labels for both the baseline and the target are crucial to prevent misinterpretation.

❎ Con: Progress Bars Don’t Show Evolution Over Time

One limitation of progress bars is that they only show the current status. They don’t state how progress has changed over time or when the goal will be reached. It makes it hard to see if improvements are happening steadily, in big leaps, or falling behind schedule.

To add more context, you can combine progress bars with timeline charts. This will show both historical progress and future projections. You can also include trend indicators. For example, you could use percentage change labels (like "+5% since last year") or arrows (⬆️ for improvement, ⬇️ for setbacks). These elements can give a quick sense of direction.

➡️ Conclusion: A Clear but Limited Tracking Tool

Progress bars provide a fast and clear way to track sustainability goals. They make progress easy to see. Yet, they have limitations. They only show the current status without context on progress over time or if it is on track. Their effectiveness relies on how the scale is set and labeled. While they are great for basic tracking, other visualizations may be needed for a complete view.

Line Chart

A line chart with a target line is a popular way to show progress toward a long-term sustainability goal. The chart displays actual performance as a continuous line. A separate target line shows the desired path over time. This setup helps track trends and compare current progress with sustainability commitments. It allows stakeholders to see if goals are being met.

Annual Sustainability Report 2023 - 2024 Nuveen Real Estate

✅ Pro: A Simple and Recognizable Visualization

A line chart has a key strength: its simplicity. This type of chart is known and easy for most audiences to understand. Comparing actual performance to target pathways is simple. It shows if an organization is on track or falling behind.

You can add multiple target lines to show different scenarios or benchmarks. To maintain clarity distinguish actual data from targets using styling choices. Use colours, dashed lines, or opacity changes, as shown in the Nuveen Real Estate example. Also, don’t forget about direct labeling. Marking with direct labels which lines are actual data and which are targets helps avoid confusion. This makes the chart easier to read at a glance.

❎ Con: Tracking Progress, but Not the Journey

A line chart shows the overall direction of progress. However, it doesn't explain how an organization will achieve its sustainability goals.

Sustainability improvements rarely happen in a straight line. They can include big changes, large investments, or new regulations. A simple trend line doesn’t show these complexities. This is important in CSRD reporting. Readers want clear information on not just if goals are met, but also on the actions and choices that lead to progress.

⭐ Tip: Bringing Context with Annotations and Additional Visuals

To enhance a line chart's story, add annotations. These can explain key milestones, like a new sustainability policy or an impactful initiative launch.

If the path to reaching a target includes several important steps, a combination of charts might work better. You could use a bar chart or a waterfall chart in combination with a line chart. These help show the actions that lead to sustainability improvements.

➡️ Conclusion: A Clear View of Progress, but Context Matters

Line charts with target lines are simple and effective for tracking sustainability progress over time. It makes trends immediately visible. Their familiarity and clarity make them an excellent choice for CSRD reporting.

Yet, adding annotations or complementary visuals can explain the steps toward sustainability commitments. Using bar charts or waterfall charts with the line chart gives a clearer view of how sustainability commitments are being met.

Stacked Area Chart

A stacked area chart is useful for visualizing the composition of multiple factors contributing to a total value over time. A stacked area chart shows more detail than a line chart. It breaks down key components and helps explain the strategies for reaching sustainability goals.

Annual Sustainability Report 2023 - 2024 Nuveen Real Estate

✅ Pro: Showing the Contribution of Different Factors

One of the key advantages of a stacked area chart is that it breaks down sustainability goals into distinct components. For example, emission reductions from renewable energy, efficiency improvements, and carbon offsets. This adds transparency to sustainability reporting.

It also makes it easy to see which strategies are driving progress and how they evolve over time. In CSRD reporting, this level of detail helps readers understand not just the goal, but the pathway toward achieving it.

⭐ Tip: Ensuring Clarity Through Structure and Labeling

In a stacked area chart, multiple elements are layered on top of one another. Clear structuring and labeling are essential to keep the visualization readable. If too many categories are included, the chart can become cluttered. It makes it difficult to distinguish between individual categories. Smaller contributions might get lost, especially if they form thin layers at the top. To avoid confusion, place labels inside or next to the areas instead of relying on a legend.

The order of the stacked layers also plays a key role in readability. For area charts, it is better to place the most important category at the bottom. This provides a strong reference point, making comparisons more intuitive. Smaller or less impactful factors can be grouped into an "Other" category. It simplifies the visualization and prevents minor contributions from cluttering the chart.

Another way to improve clarity is by using percentages instead of absolute values. This is shown in the United example above. This approach makes it easier to compare the relative contribution of each initiative over time. This ensures that shifts in sustainability efforts remain noticeable. This works even if total values fluctuate.

➡️ Conclusion: Great for Showing Contributions, Less for Precise Comparisons

A stacked area chart is a powerful way to visualize how different sustainability initiatives work together to achieve long-term goals. It provides more detail than a simple line chart while keeping the overall progress front and center. Thoughtful design choices are essential to keep the chart clear and informative. This includes limiting the number of categories, using direct labeling, and ordering the stack.

A stacked area chart helps stakeholders understand both the total impact and the key steps taken to reach sustainability goals.

Waterfall Chart

A waterfall chart uses columns to break down how you're moving from a starting point to a sustainability goal. It shows how different factors contribute to your final target.

Annual Report 2023 H+H International A/S

✅ Pro: Showing the Contribution of Different Factors

A key benefit of a waterfall chart is how well it shows how different parts add to overall progress. Each column represents an individual factor, making it easy to identify the key drivers behind changes. This detail helps a lot in sustainability reporting where transparency is key. Breaking progress into steps helps stakeholders see how each part impacts the final result.

⭐ Tip: Navigating the Baseline

Now, when you're working with waterfall charts, there are a few things to keep in mind. Since each column builds off the previous one, they don't share a common baseline. This can make direct comparisons a bit tricky. To help viewers understand how each step connects, we recommend adding connector lines between the columns. And, of course, labeling the values on the columns is super helpful for making those comparisons. Gridlines can also lend a hand, but remember, keep it clean and avoid clutter.

Because of this baseline issue, it can also be hard to tell if a column represents a positive or negative change. That's why using different colors to distinguish between increases and decreases is important.

Finally, to give everyone a solid sense of the overall picture, starting and ending with full columns is key. It provides visual anchors that share a baseline. Also, it makes the starting and ending goals crystal clear and helps in making those overall comparisons.

❎ Con: Value Disparity

Speaking of comparisons. It's worth noting that waterfall charts work best when the values aren't too different. If your starting point is huge and you have some small changes, those small changes might be hard to spot. So, these charts are most effective when the differences between your start, finish, and the steps between aren't too extreme.

➡️ Conclusion: A Clear Story of Progress

So, bottom line, what do waterfall charts do? They give you a straightforward way to show how you're actually getting to your sustainability goals. You lay out each step, and explain what you did along the way. It's like showing your work, step by step. And that's exactly why they're useful for reporting. Especially when you need to be clear about how your decisions are helping you reach your targets. They help you tell a clear and honest story about your progress.

Summary Visual

Conclusion: Making Long-Term Targets Clear and Actionable

Effective sustainability reporting isn’t about meeting CSRD requirements. It’s about making long-term commitments clear, measurable, and actionable. The right visualizations help translate complex targets into transparent, trackable progress that stakeholders can easily understand.

As shown in this article, different chart types serve different purposes. Some, like bar charts with extra bars or overlapping bar charts, highlight the gap between actual performance and targets. Others, like stacked bar charts and waterfall charts, provide insight into contributing factors. Dot plots and bullet charts keep reports compact while maintaining clarity, and line charts help track trends over time.

No single visualization works in every scenario. A strong sustainability report combines many chart types to ensure a balanced and complete picture. Thoughtful data visualization strengthens credibility and engagement. Whether you're tracking environmental impact, social initiatives, or governance improvements.

By choosing the right tools, companies can move beyond compliance. They create sustainability reports that are not only informative but also compelling—demonstrating both ambition and accountability.

Resources/further readings

https://finance.ec.europa.eu/capital-markets-union-and-financial-markets/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/corporate-sustainability-reporting_en

https://www.efrag.org/en/sustainability-reporting

https://www.globalreporting.org/

https://www.stratecta.exchange/how-to-define-esg-targets-under-the-csrd/

https://www.datylon.com/resources/chart-library

https://solidflow.io/blog/csrd-report-examples/